Key global tax policy proposals at play for manufacturers

INSIGHT ARTICLE  | 

Authored by RSM US LLP


Reinvigorating manufacturing and creating jobs is a central theme for the Biden administration. While the erosion of the U.S. manufacturing base has been a concern for more than two decades, the pandemic and the resulting supply chain disruptions have highlighted the weaknesses in the nation’s industrial footprint and supply chain capabilities.

In response, manufacturing companies are reevaluating their global supply chains, including setting up operations near their larger original equipment manufacturer customers in foreign countries, manufacturing critical products in multiple countries and expanding their geographic reach through tech-enabled business models. As companies rethink their global footprint, they also have to bear in mind the changes in tax rules that target global income. These rules have garnered a lot of attention due to concerns that the government has been losing out on taxing income that U.S.-based multinational companies earn outside of the United States.

Over the years, successive presidential administrations have tried to tackle this issue through various approaches. President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2017 was one of the more significant attempts by the U.S. government to tax companies’ overseas profits. The Biden administration also plans to raise taxes on foreign earnings, and so a focus on global income takes on even greater importance given the United States’ need to finance a post-pandemic recovery and efforts to rebuild the economy.

As manufacturing companies rethink their global footprint, they have to bear in mind the changes in tax rules that target global income.

On May 28, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released an explanation of the Biden administration’s various federal and international tax proposals, known as the Green Book. Below are some of the more significant provisions relevant to middle market global manufacturers.

  • President Biden’s tax plan calls for an increase in corporate tax rates from 21% to 28%. This may be difficult to achieve, given the Republican stance against corporate tax rate increases. However, corporate rates may rise to somewhere in the middle, especially if Democrats are able to pass tax changes through the budget reconciliation process, which only requires a simple majority vote in the Senate.
  • The TCJA taxed at 10.5% profits earned by foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-based companies if those profits exceeded a certain threshold (i.e., 10% of fixed assets). This is referred to as Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, or “GILTI” tax. Some companies have tried to manage this liability by increasing their capital investments (in order to increase the amount exempt under the GILTI tax), where possible, as part of a broader supply chain evaluation. Biden proposes removing this threshold and taxing the resulting additional GILTI income at a higher rate of 21% (this rate is linked to the corporate tax rate of 28% and will change accordingly). If Congress changes the corporate rate to 28%, a 21% tax on foreign earnings treated as GILTI will still provide a modest incentive to operate outside the United States.

In addition, the Biden administration proposal would no longer allow companies to offset losses earned in some countries against profits earned in other countries for purposes of computing their GILTI tax liability.

  • Prior to the Green Book’s release, the Biden administration floated the idea of an offshoring penalty tax as a surtax on profits. However, this penalty did not make its way into the Green Book, which instead included a proposal to eliminate any deduction for expenses incurred to offshore a trade or business that results in a loss of U.S. jobs. Conversely, in the case of a trade or business being “on-shored,” a credit of 10% for those “on-shoring” expenses would be provided. (It’s important to note that just because an item did not make it into the Green Book does not mean it couldn’t eventually make its way into legislation.)
  • The TCJA provided incentives to U.S. companies regarding certain export sales and service income. It seems likely that these will be repealed, in which case the government might direct resulting savings toward promoting research and development activities.

In addition to the U.S. tax proposals that the administration has outlined in the Green Book, there are ongoing discussions at a global level between developed nations that call for a global minimum tax of 15%. In particular, the tax policy arm of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has proposed a minimum tax that multinational companies have to pay on their global profits, which is intended to discourage companies from keeping their profits in low-tax jurisdictions. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced in early July that “a group of 130 nations has agreed to a global minimum tax on corporations,” but discussions are ongoing. The interplay between domestic tax proposals and these global discussions will influence U.S. tax policy negotiations. For example, if companies around the world are required to pay a 15% global minimum tax, should U.S. companies be the only ones with a higher tax bill of 21% because of the above GILTI rules? 

There are quite a few boxes to be checked before either U.S. tax policy or global tax policy is agreed upon, approved and implemented by the U.S. Congress. Timing is also critical: global minimum tax discussions would obviously need to be completed before U.S. tax policy changes in order for them to have a direct impact on current policy negotiations in Congress. If U.S. lawmakers fail to pass tax legislation before the midterm elections in November 2022, the tax policy landscape could change dramatically should Republicans win a majority in either the House or Senate. Arguably from a political perspective, these legislative actions need to be made in 2021, given 2022 is an election year, and typically raising taxes in an election year is not favored by Congress. Global tax policy proposals will continue to be at the forefront of the U.S. policy debate, and taxpayers will need to evaluate a variety of iterations before the debate is over. Global manufacturers reevaluating their supply chains need to model the significant tax policy alternatives forming part of the global tax policy debate in order to best prepare for the future.

This article was written by Shruti Gupta and originally appeared on 2021-07-26.
2021 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
https://rsmus.com/what-we-do/services/tax/key-global-tax-policy-proposals-at-play-for-manufacturers.html

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each is separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/about us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.

GreerWalker is a proud member of RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how GreerWalker can assist you, please call (704) 377-0239.